The most important areas that Trump’s revocation of funds has impacted include gender-based violence, contraceptive and biomedical studies and research, the development of contraceptive products and distribution and family planning programs that connect HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections (STD) Information and assistance, post-abortion treatment the education of sexual and reproductive health as well as the education of health professionals.
If these plans are not implemented, a lot of babies may suffer health problems due to the increased risk of high-risk births, particularly infants born to mothers who are adolescent. Couples will be denied the ability to use modern contraceptives, which can lead to unwanted pregnancy.
A significant portion of these unwanted pregnancy could lead to unsafe, illegal abortions. It is also important to consider what the consequences of a lack of knowledge and the availability of contraceptives could affect efforts to stop HIV/AIDS, as well as the other STDs.
There’s also the possibility of strains on the family’s future budgets for national health because of the absence of knowledge and services to ensure secure termination of pregnancy when it comes to Zika babies.
Thousands of babies could be at risk of developing health issues. Erik De Castro/Reuters
The lack of access to education about family planning and services would hinder women from poorer nations the tools needed to create some kind of health security in the social system that fails to satisfy their needs in relation to sexual and reproductive health. Lack of these programs has led women to unsafe and unregulated abortions, which can be harmful to their health and lead to numerous deaths.
Women’s health and wellbeing in Southeast Asia
Within Southeast Asia, the UNFPA and US AID s ustain the sexual and reproductive health of girls and women and control the policies and programs for population control across various countries like Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, Indonesia, the Philippines and Timor-Leste.
Budgets for health in certain Southeast Asian countries are very tight because they are having to face a myriad of health issues. The slashing of funds can result in women’s reproductive or reproductive health plans being reduced since they are not considered to be considered priority areas.
The loss of women’s choices in ending their pregnancy is going to have a significant impact on family incomes in the near future (if they are expecting Zika baby, for example). This could lead to a substantial increase in health expenses in these countries.
Additionally, abortion numbers are likely to decrease. We will instead observe the increasing number of unsafe abortions. This is one of the major causes of maternal death within the area. We are at risk of compromising the financial security of families, and by expansion of these poorer countries, we think it will lessen abortions.
Girls who are pregnant, either because of an early marriage or a rape, quit school and then get low-skill jobs. Their earning potential will be lower than that of an adult woman with minimum 10 years of basic literacy and numeracy.
